Thursday 28th of September 2023
نفر 0


It is surprising that alYa`qubi, who was almost certainly a Shi’i, has devoted little space to the account of the martyrdom of the Imam alHusayn in his history[59].

It seems to be a mere summary of Abu Mikhnaf's account, with the addition at the end of a miraculous tradition. According to this, the Prophet had given Umm Salama some soil which he had received from the angel Gabriel. This would turn red when the Imam alHusayn was killed. When that happened, Umm Salama tearfully announced the death of the Imam in Medina, at the time that it had happened at Karbala'.[60]

He strays slightly from Abu Mikhnaf's account in suggesting that both the Imam alHusayn and Ibn alZubayr went to see alWalid together when he summoned them to pledge allegiance to Yazid[61].

Generally alYa'qubis account gives the impression of being a rather hurried summary of Abu Mikhnaf and it does not add appreciably to our knowledge of the historical tradition.

AlTabari's account of the martyrdom of the Imam alHusayn has long been regarded as the definitive account. He gives the isnad of the account that he uses, and interrupts the narrative to give other alternative or confirmatory traditions. In the main he relies on Ibn alKalbi and `Ammar b. Mu`awiya alDuhfi. AlTabari seems to be using `Ammar's version as a means of interpreting Ibn alKalbi’s.

Thus he gives the first half of `Ammar's version first, and then follows it with Ibn alKalbis fuller version. He then presents the second half of `Ammar's version, followed by the second half of Ibn alKalbi's. On two occasions he interprets Ibn alKalbi with differing reports from `Umar b. Shabba[62], and he concludes his account with the brief version of Husayn b. `Abd al‌Rahmansimilar to that of alBaladhuri. What emerges looks at first glance to be the authoritative version of the martyrdom of the Imam alHusayn.

However, this is not quite the case. As already mentioned, the annalistic nature of the work means that the agreement made by Mu`awiya with the Imam alHasan, and the death of the Imam alHasan and the letters of the Kufans, are not reported. The surprising thing is that, in what purports to be a comprehensive history, they are not reported elsewhere in the text. 

The other annalistic historians, alYa'qubi, alDinawari, and Ibn A'tham do not report them. These omissions must make us question alTabari's motive. The answer to this problem will lie in a more comprehensive study than this, which is limited to the account of the martyrdom of the Imam alHusayn.

We have already noted that the use of 'Ammar's version is intended to be an interpretation of Ibn alKalbi's, and thus weakens the stature of the Imam. This is probably deliberately done by alTabari. However, he ignores, at least in this account, material from the `Uthmaniyya.



[59] AlYa`qubi, Ta'rikh (Najaf, 1964), II, 22933.

[60] Ibid., p. 233.

[61] Ibid., p. 229.

[62] AlTabari, op. cit., II, 2426, 272.

source : http://www.al-islam.org
0% (نفر 0)
نظر شما در مورد این مطلب ؟
امتیاز شما به این مطلب ؟
اشتراک گذاری در شبکه های اجتماعی:

latest article

why Umar stopped from Qunfuz and did not make anything compulsory?
Who was Yazid?
During the Prophet's life
A Brief History of Imam Hussain's Life
The Battle of Uhud (624 A.D.)
Yazid Ibn Muawiyah
The Ark - The Story of Our Prophet Noah
Imam Husayn Encounters Hur
can you please tell me about the life of (Imam) Bukhari?
Major Shi'i Thinkers of the Fifth/Eleventh

user comment