English
Wednesday 24th of July 2024
0
نفر 0

From the aggregate of the quoted verses and the words of Qur’an exegetes, it becomes obvious that not only the Shī‘ah but in fact all Muslim scholars regard Imām al-Ḥasan and Imām al-Ḥusayn (‘a) as the children and offspring of the Messenger of Allah (ṣ).

From the aggregate of the quoted verses and the words of Qur’an exegetes, it becomes obvious that not only the Shī‘ah but in fact all Muslim scholars regard Imām al-asan and Imām al-Ḥusayn (‘a) as the children and offspring of the Messenger of Allah ().

2. One of the explicit verses of the Qur’an which testifies to the truthfulness of the said view is the verse of imprecation [āyah al-mubāhilah] in Sūrah Āl ‘Imrān. Below is the verse along with the exegetes’ notes:

﴿ فَمَنْ حَآجَّكَ فِيهِ مِن بَعْدِ مَا جَاءكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ فَقُلْ تَعَالَوْاْ نَدْعُ أَبْنَاءنَا وَأَبْنَاءكُمْ وَنِسَاءنَا وَنِسَاءكُمْ وَأَنفُسَنَا وأَنفُسَكُمْ ثُمَّ نَبْتَهِلْ فَنَجْعَل لَّعْنَةُ اللّهِ عَلَى الْكَاذِبِينَ ﴾

“Should anyone argue with you concerning him, after the knowledge that has come to you, say, Come! Let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, our selves and your selves, then let us pray earnestly and call down Allah’s curse upon the liars’.”[1]

Exegetes say: The stated verse which is known as the verse of mubāhilah tells about the debate of the Holy Prophet () with the chiefs of the Christians of Najrān after their expression of obstinacy. By a Divine command, the Prophet went out along with ‘Alī ibn Abī ālib, Fāimah az-Zahrā, and Imām al-asan and Imām al-Ḥusayn (‘a) with the aim of imprecation. When the chiefs of the Christians noticed the behavior of the Prophet and the Ahl al-Bayt (‘a), fear struck in their hearts and they asked the Messenger of Allah () to reconsider his decision to imprecate and curse them. The Prophet (‘a) accepted their suggestion and at the end they agreed to forge a pact.

Since both the Shī‘ah and Sunnī scholars have consensus of opinion on the fact that on the day of mubāhilah, the Commander of the Faithful (‘Alī) (‘a), Fāimah az-Zahrā, and Imām al-asan and Imām al-usayn (‘a) were with the Prophet (), it becomes very clear that when the Mesenger of Allah () said “abnā’anā” [our sons] he meant Imām al-asan and Imām al-usayn (‘a). And as such, it becomes clear that in this verse al-asan and al-usayn are considered the Holy Prophet’s () sons.

It is necessary to note that after narrating many adīths pertaining to the verse of mubāhilah, exegetes testify to the validity of this view. Here are some examples:

a. Jalāl ad-Dīn as-Suyūī narrates on the authority of Ḥākim, Ibn Marūdiyyah and Abū Na‘īm from Jābir ibn Abd Allāh (al-Anṣārī):

وسلّم [وآله] عليه الله صلىالله رسول :أنفسنا

“.فاطمة :نساءنا و الحسين و الحسن :أبناءنا و عليّّ و

““Anfusanā” [our selves] means the Messenger of Allah () and ‘Alī ibn Abī ālib, “abnā’nā” [our sons] means al-asan and al-usayn, and “nisā’nā” [our women] refers to Fāimah.”[2]

b. In his exegesis [tafsīr], Fakhr ad-Dīn ar-Rāzī mentions the said verse and says:

“.الحديث و التفسير أهل بين صحتها علىٰ كالمتّفق الرواية هذه أنّ واعلم

“Know that this tradition is an example of adīth on whose authenticity the mufassirūn and muaddithūn have consensus of opinion.”[3]

Then, he says:

و الحسن أنّ على دالّة الآية هذه :الرّابعة المسألة

وسلّم [وآله] عليه الله صلىالله رسول إبنيّ كانا u الحسين

“.إبنيّه يكون أن فوجب الحسين و الحسن فدعا أبناءه يدعوا أن وعد

“The fourth issue: The said verse testifies to the fact that al-asan and al-usayn (‘a) were sons of the Messenger of Allah () because when he was asked to call his “sons”, he called al-asan and al-usayn (‘a).”[4]

c. In his exegesis, Abū ‘Abd Allāh al-Qurubī states:

“.أبناءا يسمّون البنات ابناء أنّ علىٰ دليل [أبناءنا]”

““Abnā’nā” [our sons] (in the stated verse) testifies to the fact that the sons of one’s daughter are considered that one’s sons.”[5]

3. The Messenger of Allah’s () words are a vivid proof that Imām al-Hasan and Imām al-Husayn (‘a) are sons of the Prophet ().

Here are two examples of his sayings:

a. The Messenger of Allah () thus says concerning al-Hasan and al-Husayn (‘a):

“.أحبّني فقد أحبّهما من إبناي هذان

“These two are my sons. He who loves them loves me.”[6]

b. Pointing to Imām al-Hasan and Imām al-Husayn (‘a), the Holy Prophet () also says:

“.الدّنيا من ريحانتى هذين أبنيّ إنّ

“Verily, these two sons of mine are my bunch of sweet basil in this world.”[7]



[1] Sūrah Āl ‘Imrān 3:61.

[2] Ad-Durr al-Manthūr (Beirut), vol. 2, p. 39, the end of the commentary of the verse under discussion.

[3] Tafsīr Mafātī al-Ghayb (Egypt, 1308 AH), vol. 2, p. 488.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Al-Jāmi‘ Li Akām al-Qur’ān (Beirut), vol. 4, p. 104.

[6] Ibn ‘Asākir, Tārīkh Madīnah Dimashq (Beirut, 1400 AH), p. 59, adīth 106.

[7] Ibid., p. 62, adīth 112.

0
0% (نفر 0)
 
نظر شما در مورد این مطلب ؟
 
امتیاز شما به این مطلب ؟
اشتراک گذاری در شبکه های اجتماعی:

latest article

A glance at the traditions-2
A question about wearing jewellery by ladies/the Grand Ayatollah Sistani’s answer
Superiority of the station of imāmah
Do such actions like forging pacts with active groups and tribes, organizing a strong ...
Why should the moon be seen in the first and last day of Ramadan, but in other month like ...
Why do you regard your Imāms as “infallible” [ma‘ṣūm]?
Why do you regard your Imāms as “infallible”
Doubts
The Grand Ayatollah Sistani answered a question about fasting and educational problems.
Nose bleed and the blood entering the throat when fasting/the Grand Ayatollah Sistani’s ...

 
user comment